Injection Molding

Melt Temperature in Injection Molding: Chart by Material

Alex Yu

Alex Yu

About 7 minutes

Published Date: September 14, 2026

Melt temperature processing windows for common injection molding plastics

Once a material is on the drawing, the shop floor asks two things: whether it will run cleanly, and how many trials it will take. The answer sits further upstream than most designers expect: how forgiving the material’s processing window is. That window is the range a process parameter can move through before the part changes. A wide one absorbs temperature drift. A narrow one turns ordinary variation into extra trial rounds and schedule risk.

So the numbers come first. The chart below covers the plastics that appear in most design reviews.

Processing Windows for Common Plastics

Melt temperature here means the actual temperature of the plastic melt at the nozzle, not the setpoint shown on the machine controller. The ranges below are typical for each material family.

Typical processing temperature range for PP, ABS, PA66, PC, PPS and PEEK

A processing window covers more than temperature. Pressure, injection speed, hold time and cooling each have their own limits, and the mold and machine have to satisfy all of them at the same time. The numbers in this chart cover the temperature side of that window, which is the part your injection molding material selection decides.

Material Melt temperature, typical (°C) Mold temperature, typical (°C)
ABS 200–260 40–80
HDPE 200–280 20–60
HIPS 180–260 20–60
PA6 230–280 60–100
PA66 260–300 60–100
PBT 240–270 60–100
PC 280–320 80–120
PC-ABS 240–280 60–90
PMMA 210–250 50–80
POM 190–230 60–120
PP 200–280 20–80
TPE / TPU 180–230 20–50

High-temperature grades sit in a different range entirely, and their windows are narrower. For example, PEEK injection molding requires substantially higher melt and mold temperatures than general-purpose plastics.

Material Melt temperature, typical (°C) Mold temperature, typical (°C)
PPS 300–340 120–160
PEEK 350–400 150–200
LCP 280–340 80–120

A few notes before you use either table:

  • These are typical published windows for the family. Your resin supplier’s processing guide governs, and it commonly narrows the range further, especially for filled and modified grades.
  • A range is a boundary, not a target. Where you sit inside it depends on wall thickness, flow length and surface requirements.

If your material is not listed here, treat the nearest material in the same family as a starting point rather than an answer.

Each material gets two numbers in that table, and they are not interchangeable. They do different jobs in the process.

Two Numbers, Two Different Jobs

What it controls. Melt temperature sets viscosity, so it decides whether the melt reaches thin walls and fine detail before it freezes. Mold temperature sets cooling rate, which drives surface gloss, internal stress and dimensional stability.

Where it is set. Melt temperature is set through barrel temperatures, screw speed and back pressure. Mold temperature is set through the temperature controller and the cooling circuits in the tool.

Melt temperature versus mold temperature in injection molding

The most common misreading is treating mold temperature as if it were melt temperature, which makes an ordinary process look far too cold. They trade off against each other, but they do not substitute for each other.

Both columns matter when you read the chart, but for a material decision the column to watch is melt temperature. Running at the lower end of that range buys shorter cooling and less risk of degradation. The upper end buys flow for thin sections. That is a choice, not a default.

Melt temperature is also the number that gets reported differently depending on where you look.

Which Temperature Number You Need

The same material will show you three values, and they are not contradicting each other. Each one answers a different question.

Melting point vs melt temperature vs machine setpoint
Number What it describes What to use it for
Melting point (often quoted in a TDS) The point where the material becomes fluid enough to flow Understanding the material itself. It is not a processing temperature.
Melt temperature (the column in the chart above) The actual temperature of the melt at the nozzle Judging whether the process is feasible and how much window you have.
Machine setpoint (what the shop floor reports) The value the controller is set to, based on heater bands and screw parameters Aligning with your molder. Not a substitute for the supplier’s range.

The gap between the second and third rows is the one that causes confusion, and it has a physical reason behind it. A large share of the energy that melts the plastic comes from shear and back pressure inside the screw, not from the heater bands. So the number on the screen and the number in the melt are related, but they are not the same value.

Melt temperature tells you whether the process fits. The shop floor reading tells you whether it is running as intended. When those two disagree, it usually means the machine is doing exactly what it was set to do.

At this point the numbers are usable. They do carry one assumption, though: that you are running a general-purpose grade.

Why Your Grade May Sit Outside the Table

The chart describes a material family. Your drawing carries a specific grade. Between the two sit several layers of modification, and each one moves the window.

How material grade changes the injection molding processing window
  • Glass or mineral fillers push the window toward higher melt temperatures, and the mold usually runs hotter as well.
  • Flame retardants, impact modifiers and weathering packages shift the window too, in a direction that depends on the additive system.
  • Switching suppliers for the same material means a different grade. The name on the box stays the same, the window does not.

None of this makes the chart inaccurate. It means the chart does not know your grade. The cheapest place to settle that is the processing guide in the TDS, before the mold is cut, rather than on the press afterwards.

Grade drift is not the only way a window moves. The other case is substituting one material for another that looks equivalent.

Close Substitutes: How the Windows Differ

Similar materials are rarely interchangeable, and the pairs below come up most often in design reviews.

Pair Which one is more forgiving What shifts
PA6 vs PA66 PA6 PA66 runs hotter and needs tighter moisture control, so the same part behaves differently on the press.
PP vs HDPE HDPE Both cover a wide range, but PP is more sensitive at the top end of the window.
PC vs PC-ABS PC-ABS PC needs higher temperatures and a narrower band, and it is more sensitive to residence time.
ABS vs HIPS HIPS HIPS processes at lower temperatures and tolerates more variation; ABS is hygroscopic and discolors near the top of its range.

Nylon is the pair most likely to come up first, since both grades appear in the same applications. The processing notes for nylon injection molding cover the drying assumptions that sit behind those two ranges.

ABS and HIPS are the other frequent swap. The ABS melt temperature range sits higher and narrower, while HIPS injection molding uses a noticeably cooler window for the same enclosure geometry.

The same family does not mean the same window. When you substitute a material, reconfirming the range costs less than tuning it back on the machine.

Material and numbers are both settled at this point. The last variable is the part itself.

When the Chart Is Not Enough

Everything above assumes a part with unremarkable geometry. Three situations compress the usable range further, and each one changes where inside it you can actually run.

Injection molded parts requiring geometry, grade and process evaluation
  • Thin walls and long flow paths. Only the upper part of the range is usable, because the melt has to stay fluid until the cavity is full. A mold flow analysis can show whether the selected grade and process settings are likely to fill the geometry before it freezes.
  • Appearance and optical parts. The window is squeezed by mold temperature and surface requirements at the same time, so melt temperature on its own does not tell you much.
  • Parts with certification or secondary operations. The acceptable grades narrow first, and the range has to be reconfirmed against the grade you actually qualify.

In these cases, getting the window confirmed against your drawing and your grade costs less than discovering it during the first trial. The injection molding team checks material choice, wall sections and flow length together, before a mold is cut. Following the main injection molding design guidelines also helps prevent geometry from narrowing an otherwise workable processing window.

Conclusion

The window a material runs in decides how much process variation the project can absorb, and that shows up in trial rounds and schedule. If your grade sits close to a boundary in the chart above, or if the part has thin walls, long flow paths or appearance requirements, upload your drawing and have the processing window confirmed for your material before tooling is committed.

FAQ

The melt arrives too viscous to reach the end of the flow path. You see incomplete fill, visible flow lines and weak weld lines, and thin sections can look under-packed. Raising the temperature in small steps while watching the fill pattern is usually more effective than raising injection pressure alone.
Viscosity keeps dropping, which helps fill but starts breaking the polymer down. The usual signs are discoloration and streaking from degraded material, and a loss of impact strength that will not appear until the part is tested. Running hotter also lengthens cooling, so cycle time rises with it.
Usually not. The rear zone runs cooler so material does not melt early in the feed section, and the front zones approach the target. What matters is the temperature at the nozzle, which is the number the supplier’s range describes.
Changing the grade after T1 normally means another trial round. Mold temperature, cooling time and gate freeze all shift with the material, so the approved samples no longer represent the production part. Where the schedule allows, lock the grade before T1. If the material choice is still open at that stage, upload your drawing and we will check the window for the candidates you are weighing.
Alex Yu

Written By

Alex Yu

Alex is the co-founder of Ideal Pro, but when he's not overseeing key projects or steering the technical team, you'll likely find him on a long bike ride, hunting for the best coffee in town, or planning his next travel adventure. With over 20 years of experience spanning international trade sales and project management, he's seen it all — tight deadlines, tricky engineering problems, and everything in between. He believes great work comes from a well-rested mind and a good cup of coffee, and he brings that same curiosity and attention to detail to every project he takes on. When he's not in the office, he's usually somewhere outdoors, exploring new places and collecting stories to share.

IDEAL PRO Manufacturing

Factory Direct MFG

Ready to Manufacture?

Get instant pricing & DFM feedback

20+

Years
Expertise

3000+

Parts
Manufactured

99.8%

On-time
Delivery

Get Instant Quote

Trusted by industry leaders

ISO 9001 Global Shipping